01/04/2025 |
NJOY Netherlands B.V. v. VMR Products LLC |
UPC_CoA_80/2025 |
ORD_15809/2025 |
ORD_15812/2025 |
Decision By Default |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
01/04/2025 |
Total Semiconductor, Llc v. Texas Instruments Inc.,Texas Instruments Deutschland Gmbh, Texas Instruments Emea Sales Gmbh |
UPC_CFI_132/2024 |
App_7563/2025 |
ORD_7652/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
31/03/2025 |
JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. |
UPC_CFI_425/2024 |
App_7618/2025 |
ORD_8454/2025 |
Amend Document |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
31/03/2025 |
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. ITCiCo Spain S.L.ITCiCo Spain S.L. |
UPC_CFI_412/2023 |
ORD_15677/2025 |
ORD_15677/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
|
|
31/03/2025 |
Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. S.P.A., Ilme Gmbh Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft v. Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. Kg |
UPC_CoA_170/2025 |
App_15086/2025 |
ORD_15367/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
31/03/2025 |
Hand Held Products, Inc. v. Scandit AG |
UPC_CoA_520/2024 |
App_12551/2025 |
ORD_13574/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
28/03/2025 |
Nichia Corporation v. Endrich Bauelemente Vertriebs GmbH |
UPC_CFI_594/2024 |
App_14382/2025 |
ORD_14439/2025 |
Application Rop 365 |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
28/03/2025 |
PHOENIX CONTACT GmbH & Co. KG v. Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. S.P.A., Ilme Gmbh Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft |
UPC_CoA_170/2025 |
App_14792/2025 |
ORD_15005/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2025 |
ZENTIVA K.S., ZENTIVA PORTUGAL, LDA |
UPC_CFI_698/2024 |
App_9038/2025 |
ORD_10348/2025 |
Application Rop313 |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section |
English |
|
|
|
|
27/03/2025 |
DISH Technologies L.L.C., Sling TV L.L.C. v. Cloudflare. Inc. |
UPC_CFI_471/2023 |
ORD_15005/2025 |
ORD_15005/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/03/2025 |
STÄUBLI TEC-SYSTEMS GMBH v. Respondents |
UPC_CoA_290/2024 |
APL_31428/2024 |
ORD_69054/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/03/2025 |
OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v STEROS GPA INNOVATIVE S.L. |
UPC_CFI_260/2025 |
ACT_14438/2025 |
ORD_14757/2025 |
Application for an Order for inspection pursuant to RoP199 |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/03/2025 |
AMPERSAND Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbB v. Panasonic Holdings Corporation, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications, OROPE Germany |
UPC_CFI_ 210/2023 |
App_5154/2025 |
ORD_5519/2025 |
Application RoP262.1 (b) |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/03/2025 |
Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate m.b.H. v. STADAPHARM, STADA, Sanofi |
UPC_CFI_146/2024 |
App_11680/2025 |
ORD_13509/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
24/03/2025 |
TIRU v. VALINEA ENERGIE |
UPC_CFI_814/2024 |
66573/2024 |
ORD_13139/2025 |
Request to review an order ex-parte |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
|
|
|
24/03/2025 |
TIRU v MAGUIN SAS |
UPC_CFI_813/2024 |
66560/2024 and 7220/2025 |
ORD_9276/2025 |
Request to review an order ex-parte |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
|
|
|
24/03/2025 |
Amazon Europe Core S.à.r.l.; Amazon EU S.à r.l.; Amazon.com, Inc. v. Nokia Technologies Oy |
UPC_CoA_835/2024 |
App_13834/2025 |
ORD_14282/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
21/03/2025 |
Barco N.V. v.Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology Co. Ltd., Yealink (Europe) Network Technology B.V. |
UPC_CFI_582/2024 |
ACT_54438/2024 |
ORD_68979/2024 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
21/03/2025 |
Mul-T-Lock France, Mul-T-Lock Suisse v. IMC Créations |
UPC_CFI_702/2024 |
App_10014/2025 |
ORD_11997/2025 |
Preliminary objection |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
|
|
|
21/03/2025 |
Hand Held Products, Inc. v Scandit Ag |
UPC_CFI_76/2024 |
App_12931/2025 |
ORD_12950/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
20/03/2025 |
Brodrene Hartmann A/S v. Omni-Pac Ekco GmbH Verpackungsmittel, Omni-Pac GmbH Verpackungsmittel |
UPC_CFI_115/2024_UPC_CFI_377/2024 |
ORD_9089/2025 |
ORD_9089/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
19/03/2025 |
Chint Solar Netherlands B.V. , Astronergy Europe GmbH , Astronergy Solarmodule GmbH , Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Astronergy GmbH, Astronergy Solar Netherlands B.V. v. JingAo Solar |
UPC_CFI_425/2024 |
App_54919/2024 |
ORD_55185/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
19/03/2025 |
Adeia Guides Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) B.V., The Walt Disney Company Limited, Disney Interactive Studios, Inc. |
UPC_CFI_665/2024 |
ORD_13670/2025 |
ORD_13670/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
19/03/2025 |
EJP Maschinen GmbH v. MSG Maschinenbau GmbH |
UPC_CFI_696/2024 |
ACT_61090/2024 |
ORD_65866/2024 |
Application For Costs |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
*_* |
1. Costs of the legal proceedings pursuant to Art. 69 UPCA are those (actually) incurred in the pending proceedings. Other costs are those that are directly and closely related to the proceedings in question._x000D_
_x000D_
2.The respective costs in question, for which reimbursement is requested, must cumulatively be reasonable and proportionate, which is always a question of the individual case._x000D_
_x000D_
3.Reasonable essentially means necessity. Fundamentally, from an ex-ante perspective of a reasonable and economically rational party, the decisive factor is whether the respective cost-triggering measure appeared objectively necessary and suitable to achieve the legitimate litigation objective. The measure must have appeared pertinent for the pursuit or defense of legal rights._x000D_
_x000D_
_x000D_
4.Appropriateness primarily concerns the amount of costs. The costs actually incurred by the necessary measure must not be disproportionate in their specific amount. In particular, they must not be disproportionate to the value of the proceedings, the significance of the matter, the level of difficulty and the complexity of the legally and factually decision-relevant issues, or the prospects of success of the cost-incurring measure._x000D_
_x000D_
5. Costs for the preparation of the application for the determination of costs are generally reimbursable. |
|
19/03/2025 |
EJP Maschinen GmbH v. MSG Maschinenbau GmbH |
UPC_CFI_696/2024 |
ACT_61090/2024 |
ORD_69088/2024 |
Application For Costs |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
*_* |
1. Legal costs pursuant to Art. 69 UPCA are those that have (actually) been incurred in the pending proceedings. Other expenses are those that are directly and closely related to the proceedings in question._x000D_
_x000D_
2. The respective costs in question, for which reimbursement is requested, must cumulatively be reasonable and proportionate, which is always a question of the individual case._x000D_
_x000D_
3. Reasonable essentially means necessity. Fundamentally, from an ex-ante perspective of a reasonable and economically rational party, the decisive factor is whether the respective cost-triggering measure appeared objectively necessary and suitable to achieve the legitimate litigation objective. The measure must have appeared pertinent for the pursuit or defense of legal rights._x000D_
_x000D_
4. Appropriateness primarily concerns the amount of costs. The costs actually incurred by the necessary measure must not be disproportionate in their specific amount. In particular, they must not be disproportionate to the value of the proceedings, the significance of the matter, the level of difficulty and the complexity of the legally and factually decision-relevant issues, or the prospects of success of the cost-incurring measure._x000D_
_x000D_
5. Costs for preparing the application for a cost decision are generally reimbursable. |
|