Moteur de recherche 
dans les décisions 
de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie)  des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

  • test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper
  • avocat OR représentant”,  “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter
  • test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici


1353 résultats trouvés




Date
Parties
Numéro de l'affaire
Numéro de registre
Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance
Type d'action
Juridiction - Division
Langue de procédure
Sommaire
Mots clés
Documents
Date Parties Numéro de l'affaire Numéro de registre Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance Type d'action Juridiction - Division Langue de procédure Details Sommaire Mots clés Documents
22/08/2025 Brita SE v. AQUASHIELD DACH GmbH, AQUASHIELD EUROPE s.r.o., Gasmarine BV Srl, MGR26 Société à responsabilité limitée UPC_CFI_248/2024 ACT_29522/2024 ORD_69429/2024 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
22/08/2025 Tridonic GmbH & Co KG v. CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd, CUPOWER Europe GmbH UPC_CFI_459/2023 App_35225/2025 ORD_35254/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
22/08/2025 Tridonic GmbH & Co. KG v. Inventronics GmbH UPC_CFI_459/2023 App_35225/2025 - Generic application Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
21/08/2025 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. MediaTek Germany GmbH, MediaTek, Inc. UPC_CFI_248/2025 App_34962/2025 ORD_35334/2025 Application RoP262A Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
21/08/2025 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. v. MediaTek Germany GmbH, MediaTek, Inc. UPC_CFI_248/2025 App_34962/2025 ORD_35006/2025 Application RoP262A Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
21/08/2025 HMD Global Oy v. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. UPC_CFI_494/2025 App_34702/2025 ORD_34789/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division German - 1. The time limit for responding to the statement of defense under Rule 23 of the Rules of Procedure is already set at a level that allows for the clarification of the facts and internal coordination—even across vacation periods—in international patent disputes falling within the jurisdiction of the Unified Patent Court. 2. If, in SEP proceedings, a license offer has been made by the claimant or the license pool in which it participates for several years, and a counteroffer has been made by the defendant, the fact that not only bilateral negotiations but also pool negotiations play a role in antitrust defense does not justify an extension of the time limit for responding to the complaint.
21/08/2025 Brodrene Hartmann A/S v. Omni-Pac GmbH Verpackungsmittel, Omni-Pac Ekco GmbH Verpackungsmittel UPC_CFI_115/2024_UPC_CFI_377/2024 ACT_13359/2024 ORD_69456/2024 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
21/08/2025 Kodak Holding GmbH, Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH v. Fujifilm Corporation UPC_CoA_312/2025_UPC_CoA_333/2025 App_35051/2025 ORD_35325/2025 Application RoP262A Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
21/08/2025 Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH v. BALLINNO B.V. UPC_CFI_230/2024 App_34189/2025 ORD_35247/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat English    
21/08/2025 Black Sheep Retail Products B.V. v. HL Display AB UPC_CFI_386/2024_UPC_CFI_610/2024 App_9257/2025 ORD_35239/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division English    
21/08/2025 Black Sheep Retail Products B.V. v. HL Display AB UPC_CFI_386/2024_UPC_CFI_610/2024 App_26908/2025 ORD_28264/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division English    
21/08/2025 Yealink (Xiamen) Network Technology Co. Ltd., Yealink (Europe) Network Technology B.V. UPC_CoA_317/2025_UPC_CoA_376/2025 App_35194/2025 ORD_35339/2025 Generic application Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
21/08/2025 Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. expert klein GmbH, expert e-Commerce GmbH UPC_CoA_764/2024_UPC_CoA_774/2024 App_34793/2025 ORD_35350/2025 Generic application Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) German    
21/08/2025 LIFE 365 S.R.L., LIFE 365 ITALY S.P.A. v. LAMA France, HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. UPC_CoA_23/2025 App_33358/2025 ORD_35277/2025 Application Rop313 Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) French    
21/08/2025 Microsoft Corporation v. Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy UPC_CoA_363/2025 ORD_35283/2025 ORD_35283/2025 Generic Order Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
21/08/2025 Tridonic GmbH & Co. KG v. Inventronics GmbH UPC_CFI_580/2025 ACT_30657/2025 ORD_35179/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
20/08/2025 Centripetal Limited v. Keysight Technologies UPC_CFI_414/2024 App_34743/2025 ORD_35171/2025 Application Rop 333 Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
20/08/2025 expert klein GmbH, expert e-Commerce GmbH v. Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. UPC_CoA_380/2025 APL_20125/2025 ORD_22147/2025 Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221) Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) German    
20/08/2025 Lepu Medical (Europa) Cooperatief U.A., Lepu Medcial Technology (Peking) Co., Ltd. v. Occlutech GmbH UPC_CFI_630/2025 ORD_34687/2025 ORD_34687/2025 Generic Order Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
19/08/2025 OrthoApnea S.L. and Vivisol B BV (Applicants) v. *** UPC_CFI_131/2025 ORD_35065/2025 ORD_35065/2025 Generic Order Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division Dutch 1. A request for correction (pursuant to Rule 353 of the Rules of Procedure) serves to correct material errors and/or obvious clerical errors or calculation errors. A calculation error is an error in an arithmetic operation._x000D_ 2. The Court cannot, in the context of a Rule 353 RoP procedure, reconsider the grounds for its decision. Given that the Court's jurisdiction is exhausted with regard to the subject matter of the correction order (the earlier order or decision), it cannot have any extending or limiting effect on the earlier order or decision that is the subject matter of the correction order. Any alleged errors of law, logic or any other intellectual errors in the order or decision to be corrected are not the subject of a correction order. In this sense, a correction order (or a request for one) does not affect the time limits for appeal (relating to alleged errors of law, logic or any other intellectual errors) which commence from the date of the order or decision that is the subject of the correction order. Rectification, Terms for Appeal, R. 353 RoP
19/08/2025 ASUS Computer GmbH, ASUSTeK Italy S.r.l., ASUS France S.a.r.l., ASUS Europe B.V., Ninepoint GmbH UPC_CFI_452/2025 App_34857/2025 ORD_34904/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
19/08/2025 Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.p.A. v. Zhejiang Fluorine Chemical New Material Co., Ltd., Shanghai Youcheng International Trade Co., Ltd., Hubei Fluorine New Materials Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Benia New Material Technolo-gy Co., Ltd. UPC_CFI_319/2025 ORD_35092/2025 ORD_35093/2025 Rule 264 Order Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division English    
19/08/2025 Adeia Guides Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company (Benelux) B.V., Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., The Walt Disney Company Limited UPC_CFI_666/2024_UPC_CFI_ 199/2025 App_34490/2025 ORD_34921/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division English    
18/08/2025 Moderna Norway AS, Moderna, Inc., Moderna Sweden AB, Moderna France SASU, Moderna Italy S.R.L., Moderna Switzerland GmbH, Moderna Denmark ApS, Moderna Biotech UK Limited, Moderna Germany GmbH, ModernaTX, Inc., Moderna Portugal Unipessoal LDA, Moderna Belgium S.R.L., Moderna Poland SP. Z.O.O., Moderna Netherlands B.V., Moderna Biotech Spain SL v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation, Genevant Sciences GmbH UPC_CFI_191/2025 UPC_CFI_192/2025 App_33094/2025 ORD_34976/2025 Application Rop 333 Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division English    
18/08/2025 Realme Chongqing Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd, OROPE Germany GmbH, Reflection Investment B.V., Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., Oleading B.V., OTECH Italia S.r.l., OTECH Germany GmbH, Realme Germany GmbH, OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. UPC_CFI_460/2025 App_33670/2025 ORD_33865/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division English    
1 ... 4 5 6 ... 55