Moteur de recherche 
dans les décisions 
de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie)  des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

  • test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper
  • avocat OR représentant”,  “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter
  • test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici


1260 résultats trouvés




Date
Parties
Numéro de l'affaire
Numéro de registre
Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance
Type d'action
Juridiction - Division
Langue de procédure
Sommaire
Mots clés
Documents
Date Parties Numéro de l'affaire Numéro de registre Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance Type d'action Juridiction - Division Langue de procédure Details Sommaire Mots clés Documents
27/07/2025 Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. Photon Wave Co., Ltd. UPC_CFI_101/2025 ACT_6395/2025 ORD_29348/2025 Application For Costs Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat English    
25/07/2025 OrthoApnea S.L., Vivisol B BV v. Jef Nelissen UPC_CFI_131/2025 ACT_7974/2025 ORD_33711/2025 Application For Costs Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division Dutch 1. An increase or decrease in the ceiling set out in the administrative decision of 24 April 2023 on the “Scale of recoverable costs ceilings” must be requested as early as possible in the procedure in accordance with Article 2(4) and (5) of the aforementioned administrative decision. A request to this effect made during the cost proceedings shall (in principle) be considered late. Such late submission may not apply to the defendant if they are only informed of the actual representation costs claimed by the claimant during the cost proceedings._x000D_ 2. The costs claimed are considered to be “facts”. If these are disputed, it is for the claimant (pursuant to Article 54 UPCA and Rule 172.1. RoP) to provide evidence in support of the “fact” alleged._x000D_ 3. The Court sees no reason or legal basis why the burden of proof and the standard of proof incumbent on the claimant in the context of cost proceedings should be different or lower than those applicable to other ‘facts’ submitted in the course of UPC proceedings. The reference to any national practices of the country of the ‘representatives’ (e.g. in the light of the standard of proof for representation costs) does not undermine the UPC principle on the burden of proof and the standard of proof as set out in Article 54 UPCA (and Rule 172.1. RoP)._x000D_ 4. If the ‘facts’ (‘costs’) are disputed by the defendant and if the claimant has evidence to support the “facts” (‘costs’) presented, the claimant is obliged to submit such evidence. Contrary to what Rule 156.1 RoP suggests, such evidence does not only have to be submitted if the Court requests it. Rule 156.1. RoP merely states that the Judge-Rapporteur has the power (‘may’) to request that written evidence be submitted and does not relieve the claimant of its burden of proof as set out in Article 54 UPCA and Rule 172.1. RoP._x000D_ 5. In application of the discretion provided for in the preamble to the administrative decision of 24 April 2023 ‘on the scale of recoverable costs ceilings’, the Court has a large margin of appreciation for the Court and considerations of equity, it is able to apply the ceiling (as a safety net) to the recoverable representation costs if the circumstances of the case justify this._x000D_ 6. Translation costs (including translations made in the light of the defence and communication between clients and their legal representatives (‘representatives’) (or translations of decisions taken in the language of the proceedings) as well as the travel and accommodation costs of the legal representatives (‘representatives’) fall under representation costs. Rule 152.1. RoP must be interpreted broadly in this sense. costs, ceiling of representation costs, Representation Costs, burden of proof
25/07/2025 Centripetal Limited v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. UPC_CFI_636/2025 App_32933/2025 ORD_32958/2025 Procedural Order Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
25/07/2025 TRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v. IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG UPC_CFI_733/2024 ORD_32794/2025 ORD_32794/2025 Generic Order Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
24/07/2025 Applicant *** UPC_CoA_521/2025 APL_28067/2025 ORD_33655/2025 Petition for review of Registrar's decision Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
24/07/2025 Applicant *** UPC_CoA_347/2025 APL_18313/2025 ORD_33654/2025 Petition for review of Registrar's decision Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
24/07/2025 Applicant *** UPC_CoA_300/2025 APL_15506/2025 ORD_33642/2025 Petition for review of Registrar's decision Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
24/07/2025 Applicant *** UPC_CoA_614/2025 APL_32076/2025 ORD_33656/2025 Petition for review of Registrar's decision Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
24/07/2025 Truma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v. CAN Srl Airxcel Europe UPC_CFI_512/2024_UPC_CFI_794/2024 App_32860/2025 ORD_32907/2025 Application Rop 265 Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division German    
24/07/2025 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P v. LAMA France UPC_CoA_24/2025_UPC_CoA_23/2025 App_32051/2025 ORD_33657/2025 Application Rop 265 Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) French    
24/07/2025 Hanshow Germany GmbH v. VusionGroup SA UPC_CoA_285/2025 ORD_33660/2025 ORD_33660/2025 Generic Order Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) French    
24/07/2025 OTEC Präzisionsfinish GmbH v. STEROS GPA Innovative S.L. UPC_CoA_579/2025 App_33129/2025 ORD_33644/2025 Generic application Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English    
24/07/2025 Cilag GmbH International, Ethicon LLC v. RiVOLUTiON GmbH UPC_CFI_381/2025 App_33424/2025 ORD_33602/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
24/07/2025 ZTE Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Italia S.p.A, Samsung Electronics France, Samsung Electronics GmbH, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Benelux B.V., Samsung Electronics Romania S.R.L. UPC_CFI_850/2024 ORD_33617/2025 ORD_33617/2025 Generic Order Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
23/07/2025 Fujifilm Corporation v. Kodak GmbH, Kodak Graphic Communications GmbH , Kodak Holding GmbH UPC_CFI_365/2023 App_25602/2025 ORD_26531/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
23/07/2025 QIAGEN Sciences, LLC v. bioMérieux S.A., bioMérieux Deutschland GmbH UPC_CFI_181/2025 App_33456/2025 ORD_33561/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division English    
23/07/2025 Visibly Inc. v. Easee Holding B.V., Easee B.V., *** UPC_CoA_526/2025 App_32598/2025 ORD_32880/2025 Application Rop 265 Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English - -
22/07/2025 Insulet Corporation v. EOFLOW Co., Ltd. UPC_CFI_597/2024 CC_65201/2024 ORD_69391/2024 Counterclaim for infringement Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section English    
22/07/2025 EOFLOW Co., Ltd. v. Insulet Corporation UPC_CFI_597/2024 ACT_56003/2024 ORD_69390/2024 Revocation Action Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section English    
22/07/2025 Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Belkin Limited, Belkin GmbH, Belkin International, Inc., UPC_CoA_845/2024 ACT_31493/2025 ORD_32084/2025 Application For Costs Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) German    
22/07/2025 TIRU v. Maguin UPC_CFI_132/2025 App_31180/2025 ORD_33141/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division French    
22/07/2025 TIRU v. Valinea UPC_CFI_130/2025 App_30813/2025 ORD_33136/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division French    
22/07/2025 Nanoval GmbH & Co. KG, v. ALD Vacuum Technologies GmbH UPC_CFI_63/2025 App_23201/2025 ORD_25245/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
21/07/2025 Malikie Innovations Ltd. v. Discord UPC_CFI_79/2025 App_32869/2025 ORD_33008/2025 Generic application Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division English    
21/07/2025 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION v. MERIL LIFE SCIENCES PVT LIMITED, VAB-LOGISTIK, UAB, SMIS INTERNATIONAL OÜ, MERIL GMBH, SORMEDICA, UAB, INTERLUX, UAB UPC_CFI_380/2023 ACT_582093/2023 ORD_598566/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division English    
1 ... 4 5 6 ... 51