|
20/06/2024 |
Tridonic GmbH & Co KG v. CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd, CUPOWER Europe GmbH |
UPC_CFI_459/2023 |
ORD_36553/2024 |
ORD_36553/2024 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1. Auch wenn der Spruchkörper gemäß R. 37.1 VerfO so bald wie möglich nach Abschluss des schriftlichen Verfahrens durch Anordnung über das Vorgehen nach Art. 33 Abs. 3 EPGÜ entschei-den soll, kann er gemäß R. 37.2 VerfO eine frühere Entscheidung treffen, wenn er das Vorbringen der Parteien berücksichtigt und ihnen rechtliches Gehör gewährt. 2. Eine gemeinsame Verhandlung von Verletzungs- und Nichtigkeitswiderklage ist dahingehend inhaltlich vorteilhaft, dass so auf der Grundlage einer einheitlichen Auslegung durch denselben Spruchkörper in der gleichen Besetzung sowohl über den Rechtsbestand als auch über die Verletzungsfrage entschieden werden kann. |
Einheitliche Entscheidung über Verletzungs- und Nichtigkeitswiderklage, frühe Entscheidung, Bifurcation, Hinzuziehung TQJ |
|
|
20/06/2024 |
Curio Bioscience Inc. v. 10x Genomics, Inc. |
UPC_CoA_234/2024 |
App_34779/2024 |
ORD_37133/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
20/06/2024 |
Curio Bioscience Inc. v. 10x Genomics, Inc. |
UPC_CoA_234/2024 |
App_34779/2024 |
ORD_37131/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
19/06/2024 |
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v. Sibio Technology Limited, Umedwings Netherlands B.V. |
UPC_CFI_131/2024 |
ACT_14945/2024 |
ORD_30431/2024 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division |
English |
|
Application for provisional measures denied. On the balance of probabilities patent will more likely than not be held to be invalid in proceedings on the merits, due to added matter. |
provisional measures; validity; added matter |
|
|
19/06/2024 |
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v. Sibio Technology Limited, Umedwings Netherlands B.V. |
UPC_CFI_130/2024 |
ACT_14944/2024 |
ORD_30434/2024 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division |
English |
|
Sufficient interest in this case despite unilateral cease-and-desist declaration (yes). Application is not devoid of purpose (R. 360 RoP). Competence for Ireland not contested. |
provisional measures; cease-and-desist declaration; legitimate interest; competence |
|
|
19/06/2024 |
ICPillar LLC v. ARM |
UPC_CoA_301/2024 |
App_35055/2024 |
ORD_36664/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
18/06/2024 |
Apple GmbH, Apple Distribution International Ltd., Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG, Apple Retail France EURL |
UPC_CFI_99/2024 |
App_26610/2024 |
ORD_27452/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1. A Generic procedural application to change the language of the proceedings using the “R. 9 RoP workflow” is admissible according to R. 4.1 RoP, although it is supposed to be submitted in the form of another specific workflow dedicated to this purpose in the Case Management System (CMS). 2. For a claimant, having had the choice of language of the patent, with the ensuing possibility that the claimant/patentee may have to conduct legal proceedings in that language, as a general rule and absent specific relevant circumstances pointing in another direction, the language of the patent as the language of the proceedings cannot be considered to be unfair in respect of the claimant. 3. The language skills of the contact person likely to follow-up the proceedings on behalf of the Claimant (being a Spanish medium-sized entity) and the existence of parallel proceedings handled in German with limited internal resources compared to those of the Defendants – equipped to handle and coordinate international patents disputes that are assigned to an experienced legal department – are relevant reasons to file an action in German although the language of the patent and relating technology is English. Even if the language skills of the representatives cannot compensate the situation of the parties themselves in this respect, the existence of considerable means remains a relevant factor to be taken into account in the balancing of interests. |
wrong workflow, language skills of a contact person, admissibility, language skills of representatives, language change request, existence of parallel proceedings |
|
|
18/06/2024 |
Google Commerce Limited, Google Ireland Limited |
UPC_CFI_100/2024 |
App_26544/2024 |
ORD_27765/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1. A Generic procedural application to change the language of the proceedings using the “R. 9 RoP workflow” is admissible according to R. 4.1 RoP, although it is supposed to be submitted in the form of another specific workflow dedicated to this purpose in the Case Management System (CMS). 2. For a claimant, having had the choice of language of the patent, with the ensuing possibility that the claimant/patentee may have to conduct legal proceedings in that language, as a general rule and absent specific relevant circumstances pointing in another direction, the language of the patent as the language of the proceedings cannot be considered to be unfair in respect of the claimant. 3. The language skills of the contact person likely to follow-up the proceedings on behalf of the Claimant (being a Spanish medium-sized entity) and the existence of parallel proceedings handled in German with limited internal resources compared to those of the Defendants – equipped to handle and coordinate international patents disputes that are assigned to an experienced legal department – are relevant reasons to file an action in German although the language of the patent and relating technology is English. Even if the language skills of the representatives cannot compensate the situation of the parties themselves in this respect, the existence of considerable means remains a relevant factor to be taken into account in the balancing of interests. |
wrong workflow, language skills of a contact person, admissibility, language skills of representatives, language change request, existence of parallel proceedings |
|
|
17/06/2024 |
AUDI AG v. Network System Technologies LLC |
UPC_CoA_278/2024 |
App_34185/2024 |
ORD_36287/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2024 |
AUDI AG |
UPC_CoA_219/2024 |
App_34190/2024 |
ORD_36283/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2024 |
AUDI AG |
UPC_CoA_221/2024 |
App_34216/2024 |
ORD_36278/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2024 |
M-A-S Maschinen- und Anlagenbau Schulz GmbH v. Altech Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi |
UPC_CFI_316/2024 |
App_36031/2024 |
ORD_36068/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Gemäß Regel 271.5 (a) VerfO kann die Zustellung an jedem Ort innerhalb der Vertragsmitgliedsstaaten erfolgen, an dem die Gesellschaft oder andere juristische Person einen dauerhaften oder vorübergehenden Geschäftssitz hat. Letzteres kann bei einem Messestand der Fall sein, wenn dort – wie im Regelfall – zumindest auch für Lieferungen geworben wird. |
Messezustellung, Vertragsmitgliedstaaten |
|
|
17/06/2024 |
Volkswagen AG |
UPC_CoA_220/2024 |
App_34211/2024 |
ORD_36281/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2024 |
Volkswagen AG |
UPC_CoA_222/2024 |
App_34219/2024 |
ORD_36276/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/06/2024 |
Volkswagen AG |
UPC_CoA_218/2024 |
App_34189/2024 |
ORD_36285/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2024 |
Tesla Germany GmbH, Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
UPC_CFI_52/2023 |
App_30430/2024 |
ORD_34041/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Successful application for protection of confidential information |
RoP 262A |
|
|
16/06/2024 |
Tesla Germany GmbH, Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE v. Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
UPC_CFI_52/2023 |
App_30430/2024 |
ORD_35922/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
|
16/06/2024 |
Sumi Agro Limited, Sumi Agro Europe Limited v. Syngenta Limited |
UPC_CFI_201/2024 |
ORD_33490/2024 |
ORD_33490/2024 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
13/06/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock |
UPC_CFI_219/2023 |
App_35009/2024 |
ORD_35648/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
|
12/06/2024 |
Samsung v Headwater |
UPC_CFI_54/2024 |
App_29928/2024 |
ORD_30693/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Change of language request granted. |
Rule 323 RoP, change language, Art. 49.5 UPCA |
|
|
06/06/2024 |
Oerlikon Textile GmbH & CO KG v. Bhagat Textile Engineers |
UPC_CFI_241/2023 |
ACT_549585/2023 |
ORD_598364/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2024 |
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited v. Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE, Tesla Germany GmbH |
UPC_CFI_54/2023 |
App_27608/2024 |
ORD_28831/2024 |
Procedural Order |
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2024 |
Neo Wireless GmbH Co. KG v. Toyota Motor Europe |
UPC_CoA_79/2024 |
APL_9578/2024 |
ORD_30505/2024 |
Appeal under RoP 220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2024 |
Daedalus Prime LLC v. Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, MediaTek Inc. (Headquarters), Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd. |
UPC_CoA_183/2024 |
App_30470/2024 |
ORD_31567/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
04/06/2024 |
Nera Innovations Ltd. v Xiaomi |
UPC_CoA_205/2024 |
App_31209/2024 |
ORD_31569/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
DE
EN
IT