Moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1^er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie) des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

“test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper”
“avocat OR représentant”, “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter”
“test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper”

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici

Recherche globale

Recherche par champs

Date


et

Parties

Numéro de l'affaire

Numéro de registre

Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance

Type d'action

Juridiction - Division

Langue de procédure

Sommaire

Mots clés

Langue du document

Nouvelle recherche

1067 résultats trouvés

Date	Parties	Numéro de l'affaire	Numéro de registre	Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance	Type d'action	Juridiction - Division	Langue de procédure	Sommaire	Mots clés	Documents
17/02/2025	Aylo Premium Ltd v. DISH Technologies	UPC_CFI_198/2024	App_56087/2024	ORD_59528/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat	English			EN
17/02/2025	Per Aarsleff A/S v. Ims Robotics Gmbh, Ims Robotics Nordic A/S	UPC_CFI_495/2024_UPC_CFI_739/2024	App_6774/2025	ORD_6888/2025	Application Rop 265	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	English		Decision, R. 265 RoP	EN
15/02/2025	Eoflow v. Insulet	UPC_CFI_380/2024	App_65673/2024	ORD_65815/2024	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section	English	The costs of a preliminary injunction must be settled at the same time as the decision on the merits, since the outcome of the preliminary phase must be considered in the framework of the overall settlement of litigation costs; cost compensation cannot be parcelled out according to the outcome of the various stages of the case but must relate to the final decision on the case as a whole.	Preliminary injunction costs on the merits	EN
15/02/2025	Eoflow v. Insulet	UPC_CFI_380/2024	App_5366/2025	ORD_7828/2025	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section	English			EN
14/02/2025	Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v. Sibio Technology Limited, Umedwings Netherlands B.V.	UPC_CoA_382/2024	APL_39664/2024	ORD_67504/2024	Appeal RoP220.1	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English	- As a general principle of claim interpretation, means-plus-function features must be understood as any feature suitable for carrying out the function. - A general injunction may be justified even if it is not shown that a patent is infringed by all possible infringing acts. One type of (likely) infringement suffices as a basis for a general preliminary injunction, which includes all possible ways of infringing. - The measures mentioned in Art. 67 UPCA may also be ordered in the framework of provisional measure proceedings, always provided that there is an urgent interest and such measures are proportionate.	urgency, balance of interest, infringement, claim construction, general injunction, order to provide information, added matter	EN
14/02/2025	Gxd-Bio Corporation v. Myriad Genetics S.R.L., Myriad Gmbh, Myriad Genetics S.A.S., Myriad Genetics B.V., Myriad Genetics, Inc., Myriad Service Gmbh, Myriad Genetics Gmbh	UPC_CFI_437/2024	App_51844/2024	ORD_68782/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
12/02/2025	Daedalus Prime LLC v. Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH	UPC_CoA_621/2024	APL_58177/2024	ORD_68947/2024	Appeal RoP220.2	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English			EN
12/02/2025	Biolitec Holding Gmbh & Co. Kg v. S.I.A. Lightguide International, Light Guide Optics Germany Gmbh	UPC_CFI_714/2024	App_67626/2024	ORD_68717/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
12/02/2025	Apple Inc., Apple Gmbh, Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. Kg, Apple Retail France Eurl, Apple Distribution International Ltd. v. Ona Patents Sl	UPC_CFI_99/2024	App_4511/2025	ORD_4743/2025	Application RoP262A	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	English			EN
12/02/2025	Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd., Meril Gmbh v. ***, SWAT Medical AB	UPC_CoA_636/2024	ORD_7289/2025	ORD_7289/2025	Generic Order	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English	- Lawyers and European Patent Attorneys are not exempted from the duty to be represented if they themselves are parties in cases before the UPC. - Representation is a point of admissibility involving public policy considerations (due process) which the Court may examine at any time, also of its own motion.	Representation	EN
12/02/2025	Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd., Meril Gmbh v. ***, SWAT Medical AB	UPC_CoA_635/2024	ORD_7284/2025	ORD_7284/2025	Generic Order	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English	- Lawyers and European Patent Attorneys are not exempted from the duty to be represented if they themselves are parties in cases before the UPC. - Representation is a point of admissibility involving public policy considerations (due process) which the Court may examine at any time, also of its own motion.	Representation	EN
12/02/2025	Meril Italy Srl v. ***, SWAT Medical AB	UPC_CoA_634/2024	ORD_64355/2024	ORD_64355/2024	Generic Order	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English	- Lawyers and European Patent Attorneys are not exempted from the duty to be represented if they themselves are parties in cases before the UPC. - Representation is a point of admissibility involving public policy considerations (due process) which the Court may examine at any time, also of its own motion.	Representation	EN
12/02/2025	Syngenta Limited v. Sumi Agro Europe Limited, Sumi Agro Limited	UPC_CFI_566/2024	ACT_53813/2024	ORD_68881/2024	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English	1. The date for the Interim Conference via videoconference is set for 6 October 2025, 10.00 a.m. 2. Suggestions for topics for the Interim Conference may be submitted until 19 September 2025. 3. The date for the Oral Hearing in person at Denisstr. 3 in Munich, room 212 and overflow room 220b, is set for 10 December 2025, 9.00 a.m. 4. The parties are summoned to the Interim Conference and the Oral Hearing. 5. The Judge-Rapporteur requests the President of the Court of First Instance to assign Judge Dorland-Galliot to the panel as a technically qualified judge pursuant to Article 34(1) of the Rules of Procedure.	scheduling	EN
11/02/2025	Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy v. Microsoft Corporation	UPC_CoA_563/2024	APL_53716/2024	ORD_68946/2024	Appeal RoP220.2	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	English	No corporate representative of a legal person or any other natural person who has extensive administrative and financial powers within the legal person, whether as a result of holding a high-level management or administrative position or holding a significant amount of shares in the legal person, may serve as a representative of that legal person, regardless of whether said corporate representative of the legal person or natural person is qualified to act as a UPC representative in accordance with Art. 48(1) or (2) UPCA. • One of the objectives of parties being represented by a lawyer is, among other things, to ensure that legal persons are defended by a representative who is sufficiently distant from the legal person which he or she represents. • The independent exercise of the duties of a representative is not undermined by the mere fact that the lawyer or the European patent attorney, qualified as a representative under Art. 48(1) or (2) UPCA, is employed by the party he or she represents. • A representative who is employed by a party must act towards the Court as an independent counsellor by serving the interests of his or her client in an unbiased manner without regard to his or her personal feelings or interests, pursuant to Art. 2.4.1 of the Code of Conduct for Representatives who appear before the Court according to R. 290.2 RoP.	Representation of parties in proceedings before the UPC, Art. 48 UPCA	EN
10/02/2025	AIM Sport Vision AG v TGI Sport Suomi Oy (previously Supponor Oy), TGI Sport Virtual Limited (previously Supponor Limited), Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL	UPC_CFI_214/2023	App_3474/2025	ORD_6926/2025	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division	English	The Court may add a party to the case when the right of defence of defendants, including the new party, are sufficiently guaranteed (R. 305 RoP). When considering the leave to amend the case or to change the claims (R. 263 RoP) the risk of irreconcilable and inconsistent decisions from different courts favours allowing the changes but at the same time protecting the frontloaded procedure of the UPC and the rights of the defendants to defend themselves must be the leading principles. The amendments to the case must be explained in R. 263 RoP application but can be detailed in an appendix.	Change in parties, Leave to change claim or amend case	EN
10/02/2025	Dolby International v. ASUS	UPC_CFI_456/2023	App_67764/2024	ORD_68550/2024	Application Rop 265	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
10/02/2025	Bsn Medical Gmbh v. Brightwake Ltd., Advancis Medical Deutschland GmbH, Advancis Medical Nederland B.V.	UPC_CFI_599/2024	App_3915/2025	ORD_5204/2025	Application Rop 365	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German		R. 365 RoP, Bestätigung Vergleich	DE EN
10/02/2025	Industria Lombarda Materiale Elettrico I.L.M.E. S.P.A., Ilme Gmbh Elektrotechnische Handelsgesellschaft v. Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. Kg	UPC_CFI_342/2024	App_45481/2024	ORD_68781/2024	Preliminary objection	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	1. Die Zuständigkeit des EPG gemäß Art. 32 Abs. 1 a) EPGÜ, Art. 2g), Art. 3c) EPGÜ umfasst Verletzungsklagen auch insoweit, als dass sie auf Benutzungshandlungen gestützt werden, die vor dem Inkrafttreten des EPGÜ und/oder in der Zeit zwischen einem Opt-Out und dem Rücktritt hiervon stattgefunden haben sollen. 2. Zuständigkeit und anwendbares Recht sind voneinander zu trennende Aspekte, die separat voneinander zu beurteilen sind. Weder kann aus der Zuständigkeit des EPG geschlossen werden, dass auf jeden zur Entscheidung gestellten Sachverhalt stets das EPGÜ Anwendung findet, noch ist das anwendbare Recht ausschlaggebend für die Zuständigkeit des EPG.	Zuständigkeit, Einspruch, Inkrafttreten EPGÜ, Anwendbares Recht	DE EN
10/02/2025	Ssab Europe Oy, Ssab Swedish Steel Gmbh v. Tiroler Rohre Gmbh	UPC_CFI_640/2024	ACT_59020/2024	ORD_68941/2024	Application For Costs	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
10/02/2025	Ssab Europe Oy, Ssab Swedish Steel Gmbh v. Tiroler Rohre Gmbh	UPC_CFI_640/2024	ACT_59020/2024	ORD_65844/2024	Application For Costs	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
10/02/2025	Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH v. Xsys Prepress N.V., Xsys Germany Gmbh, Xsys Italia S.R.L	UPC_CFI_483/2024	ORD_6847/2025	ORD_6847/2025	Generic Order	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English	1. The UPC's jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 32(1)(a) UPCA, Art. 2(g), Art. 3(c) UPCA also covers infringement actions to the extent that they are based on acts of use which are alleged to have taken place before the UPCA entered into force and/or in the period between an opt-out and the withdrawal thereof. 2. Jurisdiction and applicable law are separate aspects that must be assessed separately. It cannot be concluded from the UPC's jurisdiction that the UPCA always applies to every case to be decided, nor is the applicable law decisive for the UPC's jurisdiction.	Applicable Law, Preliminary Objection, Entry into force UPCA, Jurisdiction, Competence	EN
10/02/2025	Dolby International v. ASUS	UPC_CFI_456/2023	App_68380/2024	ORD_68548/2024	Application Rop 265	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
08/02/2025	Motorola Mobility LLC v. Telefonaktienbolaget LM Ericsson, Ericsson GmbH	UPC_CFI_488/2023	App_1202/2025	ORD_6639/2025	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	English			EN
07/02/2025	Dainese v. Alpinestars S.P.A. Alpinestars S.p.A. Alpinestars Research S.p.A. Omnia Retail S.r.l. Horizon Moto 95 - Zund.Stoff Augsburg/Ulrich Herpich E.K. Motocard Bike S.l.	UPC_CFI_472/2024	App_5885/2025	ORD_5965/2025	Generic application	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section	English	1. The position of the party attacking the patent shall be protected in the proceedings to the same extent as that of the party defending the patent. 2. Using the power of case management, which includes encouraging the parties to cooperate with each other during the proceedings (see Rule 332(a) of the Rules of Procedure), and pursuant to Rule 9(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the parties are invited to submit a -possibly joint -request for the alignment of future procedural deadlines	RULE 332 ROP. RULE 9, para 4, ROP,	EN
06/02/2025	Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd., Orope Germany Gmbh	UPC_CFI_210/2023	ACT_545551/2023	ORD_6393/2025	Counterclaim for revocation	Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division	German	Finale redigierte Fassung der SEP-Entscheidung der Lokalkammer Mannheim vom 22. November 2024 nach Abstimmung mit den Parteien		DE EN

1 ... 13 14 15 ... 43