27/09/2023 |
Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG v. Himson Engineering Private Limited |
UPC_CFI_240/2023 |
ORD_569313/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
27/09/2023 |
Philips IP Ventures B.V. ./. Edrich u.a. |
UPC_CFI_5/2023 |
ORD_576855/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Zustellungszeitpunkt |
Rule 275 Abs. 2 |
|
27/09/2023 |
Koninklijke Philips N.V. ./. Edrich u.a. |
UPC_CFI_62/2023 |
ORD_576850/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Zustellungszeitpunkt |
|
|
25/09/2023 |
PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG – v. AWM S.R.L. + SCHNELL S.P.A. |
UPC_CFI_286/2023 |
ORD_576298/2023 |
Application for preserving evidence |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
English |
|
|
preservation of evidence; inspect premises; order issued ex parte; application |
|
22/09/2023 |
N.V. Nutricia v. Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH |
UPC_CFI_201/2023 |
ORD_575922/2023 |
Application for the allocation of a technically qualified judge to the panel |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
1. Pursuant to R. 33.1 and .2 RoP, any party to the proceedings may lodge an Application for allocating a technically qualified judge (TQJ) to the panel, which request shall be lodged as early as possible in the written procedure. 2. The allocation of t |
Technically qualiefied judge (TQJ), defendant, request, allocation, President, Court of First Instance, submission, postponement, judge-rapporteur, statement of defence |
|
21/09/2023 |
Jozef Frans Nelissen v OrthoApnea S.L. |
UPC_CFI_329/2023 |
ORD_575902/2023 |
Application for preserving evidence |
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division |
Dutch |
|
rder pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence (allegedly infringing products and related documents). Extremely urgent. Order granted without hearing the allegedly infringing party. Possibility for revision and appeal. |
Order pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence |
|
21/09/2023 |
ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v HEALIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY |
UPC_CFI_75/2023 |
ORD_552745/2023 |
Application RoP262.1(b) |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section |
English |
|
Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu |
Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service. |
|
20/09/2023 |
Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH |
UPC_CFI_1/2023 |
ORD_550152/2023 |
Application RoP262.1(b) |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section |
English |
|
Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu |
Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service. |
|
19/09/2023 |
NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoStrings Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. v. 10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College |
UPC_CFI_2/2023 |
ACT_459746/2023 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Leitsätze: 1. Für eine ausreichend sichere Überzeugung des Gerichts von der Gültigkeit eines Patentes ist im Rahmen einer Anordnung einstweiliger Maßnahmen nach Art. 62 EPGÜ eine überwiegende Wahrscheinlichkeit notwendig, aber auch ausrei- chend |
|
|
13/09/2023 |
CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v. ALPINA COFFEE SYSTEMS GmbH |
UPC_CFI_182/2023 |
ACT_528738/2023 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Vienna (AT) Local Division |
German |
|
Ein Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen macht – wie eine Klage – die Inanspruchnahme der Ausnahmeregel nach R 5 der VerfO („Opt-out“) unwirksam. Der Blockademechanismus bewirkt, dass die Zuständigkeit des EPG nicht mehr entzogen werden kann. Der Schutzbereich eines europäischen Patents ist anhand von Art 69 Abs 1 EPÜ samt seinem Auslegungsprotokoll in Verbindung mit Art 24 Abs 1 lit c EPGÜ auszulegen. In einem Verfahren auf einstweilige Maßnahmen können der obsiegenden Antragsgegnerin auf Antrag endgültig Verfahrenskosten zugesprochen werden. Die Antragstellerin kann selbst bei Prozesserfolg im Verfahren in der Hauptsache die Kosten dieses Verfahrens als unterliegende Partei nicht erfolgreich geltend machen. |
|
|
11/09/2023 |
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS |
UPC_CFI_57/2023 |
557045/2023 |
Infrigement action |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
08/09/2023 |
OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS |
UPC_CFI_11/2023 |
ORD_459791/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division |
English |
|
Keynotes: |
|
|
29/08/2023 |
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v Amgen, Inc. |
UPC_ CFI_14/2023 |
ORD_566193/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2023 |
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. |
UPC_CFI_249/2023 |
ORD_567601/2023 |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2023 |
AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL |
UPC_CFI_214/2023 |
ORD_567563/2023 |
Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2023 |
AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL |
UPC_CFI_214/2023 |
ORD_567559/2023 |
Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
28/08/2023 |
AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL |
UPC_CFI_214/2023 |
ORD_567421/2023 |
Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
25/08/2023 |
Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE v. Tesla Germany u.a. |
UPC_CFI_52/2023 |
ORD_567008/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
24/08/2023 |
Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH |
UPC_CFI_1/2023 |
ORD_560432/2023 |
Preliminary Objection |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section |
English |
|
Infringement action has been lodged at a local or regional division and, if so, at what date and time this was done. Central division competent because revocation action was filed before the infringement action. |
Preliminary objection, Rule 19.1(b) RoP, Article 33.4 UCPA, internal competence, competence central division (yes), date and time of lodging, Article 4.2 RoP, hard-copy lodging, Registry Rules. |
|
23/08/2023 |
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. |
UPC_CFI 15/2023 |
ORD_562614/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
22/08/2023 |
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited |
UPC_CFI_54/2023 |
ORD_560542/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
17/08/2023 |
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v Amgen, Inc. |
UPC_ CFI_14/2023 |
ORD 562104/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
16/08/2023 |
Amgen Inc. ./.Sanof-Aventis Deutschland GmbH |
UPC_CFI_14/2023 |
ORD_562104/2023 |
General procedural order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
14/08/2023 |
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. |
UPC_CFI_249/2023 |
App_560315/2023 |
Procedural Order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
10/08/2023 |
Meril GmbH v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation u. a. |
UPC _CFI_15/2023 |
ORD_557466/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|