Moteur de recherchedans les décisionsde la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1^er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie) des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

“test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper”
“avocat OR représentant”, “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter”
“test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper”

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici

Recherche globale

Recherche par champs

Date


et

Parties

Numéro de l'affaire

Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance

Type d'action

Juridiction - Division

Langue de procédure

Sommaire

Mots clés

Langue du document

Nouvelle recherche

213 résultats trouvés

Date	Parties	Numéro de l'affaire	Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance	Type d'action	Juridiction - Division	Langue de procédure	Sommaire	Mots clés	Documents
13/10/2023	Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Groupe S.A., Sanofi Winthrop Industrie S.A., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v Amgen, Inc.	APL_572929/2023 UPC_CoA_320/2023	ORD_580110/2023	Appeal under RoP 220.2	Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU)	German		Schlagwörter: Zustellung der Klageschrift ohne in Bezug genommene oder angekündigte Anlagen; Fristverlängerung	DE EN FR
11/10/2023	ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v HELIOS K.K, RIKEN	UPC_CFI_80/2023	ORD_579545/2023	Revocation action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section	English			EN
11/10/2023	ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v HELIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY	UPC_CFI_75/2023	ORD_579543/2023	Revocation action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section	English	Parties are under an obligation to use the CMS and the dedicated workflows in the CMS to file their submissions (see e.g. Rule 4.1 RoP). It is the sole responsibility of the parties that this is done properly and timely. The Court will try to be helpful w	Rule 4.1 RoP. Case Management System (CMS), service of pleadings by means of electronic communication (278.1, 271.6 RoP).	EN
06/10/2023	NanoString Technologies Inc. ./. 10xGenomics, Inc. / President and Fellows of Harvard College	UPC_CFI 357/2023	ORD 578815/2023	Preliminary injunction	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Fear of an application for an ASI or/and AEI in the USA		DE EN
04/10/2023	Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited vs. Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE/Tesla Germany GmbH	UPC_CFI_54/2023	ORD_577763/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division	German	Anhörung zum Antrag auf Geheimhaltung und Zugangsbeschränkung nach Regel 262A. Vorläufige Anordnung der Zugangsbeschränkung auf den Parteivertreter bis zu endgültigen Entscheidung über den Antrag.	Regel 262A. Geschäftsgeheimnisse. Vorläufige Anordnung. Zugangsbeschränkung.	DE EN
04/10/2023	President and Fellows of Harvard College ./. NanoString Technologies Europe Limited	UPC_CFI_252/2023	ORD_573299/2023	Revocation Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section	English	Objections based on articles 29 and 30 Brussels Ibis Regulation may be the subject of a Preliminary objection under Rule 48 in connection with 19.1(a) RoP. Preliminary objection is to be dealt with in the main proceedings for reasons of procedural economy	Rule 48, 19.1(a) RoP Preliminary objection. Jurisdiction. Lis pendens. Related actions. Articles 29 and 30 Brussels Ibis Regulation. Rule 20.2 RoP (yes)	EN
04/10/2023	AGFA NV vs. Gucci	UPC_CFI_278/2023	ORD_ 576288 /2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division	English	Extension of deadlines in the case of a plurality of defendants. Appointment of a Representative making an electronic service possible. Alignment of deadlines. Partial consent of the other party.	Extension of deadlines according to Rule 19.1 RoP. Extension of deadlines according to Rule 23 RoP. Partial consent of the other party.	EN
03/10/2023	Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd ./. Netgear Inc./Netgear Deutschland GmbH/Netgear International Limited	UPC_CFI_9/2023	ORD 575878/2023	Infringment Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Secrecy Order	262A RoP	DE EN
29/09/2023	Edwards Lifesciences Corporation ./. Meril GmbH	UPC_CFI_15/2023	ORD_576853/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Prozesskosten/Einspruch		DE EN
27/09/2023	Philips IP Ventures B.V. ./. Edrich u.a.	UPC_CFI_5/2023	ORD_576855/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Zustellungszeitpunkt	Rule 275 Abs. 2	DE EN
27/09/2023	Koninklijke Philips N.V. ./. Edrich u.a.	UPC_CFI_62/2023	ORD_576850/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Zustellungszeitpunkt		DE EN
27/09/2023	Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG v. Himson Engineering Private Limited	UPC_CFI_240/2023	ORD_569313/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division	Italian			IT EN
25/09/2023	PROGRESS MASCHINEN & AUTOMATION AG – v. AWM S.R.L. + SCHNELL S.P.A.	UPC_CFI_286/2023	ORD_576298/2023	Application for preserving evidence	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division	English		preservation of evidence; inspect premises; order issued ex parte; application	EN
22/09/2023	N.V. Nutricia v. Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH	UPC_CFI_201/2023	ORD_575922/2023	Application for the allocation of a technically qualified judge to the panel	Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division	English	1. Pursuant to R. 33.1 and .2 RoP, any party to the proceedings may lodge an Application for allocating a technically qualified judge (TQJ) to the panel, which request shall be lodged as early as possible in the written procedure. 2. The allocation of t	Technically qualiefied judge (TQJ), defendant, request, allocation, President, Court of First Instance, submission, postponement, judge-rapporteur, statement of defence	EN
21/09/2023	Jozef Frans Nelissen v OrthoApnea S.L.	UPC_CFI_329/2023	ORD_575902/2023	Application for preserving evidence	Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division	Dutch	rder pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence (allegedly infringing products and related documents). Extremely urgent. Order granted without hearing the allegedly infringing party. Possibility for revision and appeal.	Order pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence	NL EN FR
21/09/2023	ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v HEALIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY	UPC_CFI_75/2023	ORD_552745/2023	Application RoP262.1(b)	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section	English	Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu	Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service.	EN
20/09/2023	Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH	UPC_CFI_1/2023	ORD_550152/2023	Application RoP262.1(b)	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section	English	Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu	Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service.	EN
19/09/2023	NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoStrings Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. v. 10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College	UPC_CFI_2/2023	ACT_459746/2023	Application for provisional measures	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German	Leitsätze: 1. Für eine ausreichend sichere Überzeugung des Gerichts von der Gültigkeit eines Patentes ist im Rahmen einer Anordnung einstweiliger Maßnahmen nach Art. 62 EPGÜ eine überwiegende Wahrscheinlichkeit notwendig, aber auch ausrei- chend		DE EN FR
13/09/2023	CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v. ALPINA COFFEE SYSTEMS GmbH	UPC_CFI_182/2023	ACT_528738/2023	Application for provisional measures	Court of First Instance - Vienna (AT) Local Division	German	Ein Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen macht – wie eine Klage – die Inanspruchnahme der Ausnahmeregel nach R 5 der VerfO („Opt-out“) unwirksam. Der Blockademechanismus bewirkt, dass die Zuständigkeit des EPG nicht mehr entzogen werden kann. Der Schutzbereich eines europäischen Patents ist anhand von Art 69 Abs 1 EPÜ samt seinem Auslegungsprotokoll in Verbindung mit Art 24 Abs 1 lit c EPGÜ auszulegen. In einem Verfahren auf einstweilige Maßnahmen können der obsiegenden Antragsgegnerin auf Antrag endgültig Verfahrenskosten zugesprochen werden. Die Antragstellerin kann selbst bei Prozesserfolg im Verfahren in der Hauptsache die Kosten dieses Verfahrens als unterliegende Partei nicht erfolgreich geltend machen.		DE EN FR
11/09/2023	OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS	UPC_CFI_57/2023	557045/2023	Infrigement action	Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division	Italian			IT EN
08/09/2023	OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS	UPC_CFI_11/2023	ORD_459791/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division	English	Keynotes:		EN
29/08/2023	Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v Amgen, Inc.	UPC_ CFI_14/2023	ORD_566193/2023	Infringement Action	Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division	German			DE EN
28/08/2023	AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL	UPC_CFI_214/2023	ORD_567563/2023	Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures	Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division	English			EN
28/08/2023	AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL	UPC_CFI_214/2023	ORD_567559/2023	Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures	Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division	English			EN
28/08/2023	AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL	UPC_CFI_214/2023	ORD_567421/2023	Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures	Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division	English			EN

1 ... 6 7 8 9