|
25/09/2024 |
Innovative Sonic Corporation v. Lenovo, Motorola, Digital River |
UPC_CFI_340/2024 |
App_52697/2024 |
|
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
Übereinstimmender Antrag, R. 295 (d) VerfO, Aussetzung |
|
|
25/09/2024 |
Magna PT s.r.o., Magna International France, SARL, Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG v. Valeo Electrification |
UPC_CFI_347/2024 |
|
ORD_53404/2024 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
1. Evidence in PI proceedings is generally and primarily to be submitted in writing (R. 170.1 (a) and (b) RoP), with particular importance being attached to the submission of affidavits (R. 170.2 (h) RoP). In addition, the submission of physical objects, in particular devices, products, em-bodiments, exhibits and models (R. 170.1 (c) RoP), and of electronic files and au-dio/video files (R. 170.1 (d) RoP) may be an option. 2.The Court does not summon witnesses in PI proceedings and does not provide simultaneous interpretation in this respect. |
PI proceedings, Summon of witnesses, R. 210.2 RoP, Evidence |
|
|
25/09/2024 |
Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH v. Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH |
UPC_CoA_182/2024 |
APL_21143/2024 |
ORD_44387/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
|
24/09/2024 |
Eoflow v. Insulet |
UPC_CFI_380/2024 |
App_50666/2024 |
ORD_51234/2024 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Central Division - Section |
English |
|
Article 340 RoP - concept of "panels" - conditions for joinder- issuing of order by the judge rapporteur |
connection joinder |
|
|
24/09/2024 |
Unilever France v. I.G.B. S.r.l. |
UPC_CFI_494/2023 |
App_49796/2024 |
ORD_52883/2024 |
Amend Document |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
1. Pursuant R. 263 RoP, a party may only be authorized, by the Court, to change its claims, on the twofold condition that the amendment could not have been made with reasonable diligence at an earlier stage of the proceedings and that it is not such as to disturb in an unreasonable way the conduct of the case. 2. The autorisation given by the Court, under rule R. 263 RdP, only concerns changed claims which have the effect of changing the subject matter and the scope of the dispute. 3. Changed claims that only complete those previously made do not constitute substantial modifications, which are likely to modify and affect the subject matter and the scope of the dispute and only relate to the implementation and enforcement modalities of a possible sentence. |
|
|
|
23/09/2024 |
Erik Krahbichler, SWAT Medical AB v. Edwards Lifesciences, Meril |
UPC_CFI_189/2024 |
App_33484/2024 |
ORD_36092/2024 |
Application RoP262.1 (b) |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
1. The mere fact of operating in the same field as the patent in dispute is not sufficient to establish a specific interest in the case documents on the part of the applicant. |
public access to register |
|
|
20/09/2024 |
Magna PT s.r.o., Magna International France, SARL, Magna PT B.V. & Co. KG v. Valeo Electrification |
UPC_CFI_347/2024 |
App_51893/2024 |
ORD_52043/2024 |
Application RoP262A |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2024 |
AUDI AG v. Network System Technologies LLC |
UPC_CoA_264/2024 |
APL_30168/2024 |
ORD_48996/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2024 |
Apple Retail Germany B.V. & Co. KG, Apple Distribution International Ltd., Apple GmbH, Apple Retail France EURL, Apple Inc. v. Ona Patents SL |
UPC_CoA_354/2024 |
APL_ 38948/2024 |
ORD_48659/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2024 |
Google Commerce Limited, Google Ireland Limited v. Ona Patents SL |
UPC_CoA_349/2024 |
APL_38206/2024 |
ORD_48660/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
18/09/2024 |
Erik Krahbichler v. Edwards Lifesciences, Meril, Smis |
UPC_CFI_8/2023 |
App_33493/2024 |
ORD_36466/2024 |
Application RoP262.1 (b) |
Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division |
English |
|
Article 45 UPCA means that also the written procedure of the Court shall, in principle, be open to the public unless the Court decides to make it confidential, to the extent necessary, in the interest of one of the parties or other affected persons, or in the general interest of justice or public order. If a person has made an application under Rule 262.1(b) for access to pleadings or evidence and provided a credible explanation for why he/she wants access, the application shall be approved unless it is necessary to keep the information confidential. |
RoP 262.1 (b) |
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Mala Technologies Ltd. v. Nokia Technology GmbH |
UPC_CoA_227/2024 |
APL_26889/2024 |
ORD_43637/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Microsoft Corporation v. Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy |
UPC_CFI_164/2024 |
App_40799/2024 |
ORD_41174/2024 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
AUDI AG v. Network System Technologies LLC |
UPC_CoA_217/2024 |
APL_25919/2024 |
ORD_48916/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Jef Nelissen v. OrthoApnea S.L., Vivisol B BV |
UPC_CFI_376/2023 |
ACT_581538/2023 |
ORD_598476/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division |
Dutch |
|
The use of pleading notes and visual representations/aides at the oral hearing is permitted if they are communicated to the opposing party in a timely manner. The use of physical examples/models is permitted at the oral hearing if they are filed as an additional exhibit at the registry and if they are communicated to the opposing party. Whether or not a valuation is "sufficient" in the light of the possible recoverable costs (in application of R. 152.3. RoP) does not concern any factor to be taken into consideration in assessing the valuation of the case. |
Value of action, Oral Hearing, Interim Conference |
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Volkswagen AG v. Network System Technologies LLC |
UPC_CoA_218/2024 |
APL_25922/2024 |
ORD_48922/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Microsoft Corporation v. Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy |
UPC_CFI_164/2024 |
App_42138/2024 |
ORD_43015/2024 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Powell Gilbert LLP v. Ballinno B.V., Union des Associations Européennes de Football (UEFA), Kinexon Sports & Media GmbH, Kinexon GmbH |
UPC_CFI_151/2024 |
App_39793/2024 |
ORD_40128/2024 |
Application RoP262.1 (b) |
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
1. When a request to make written pleadings and evidence available to a member of the public is made pursuant to R.262.1(b) RoP, the interests of a member of the public of getting access to the written pleadings and evidence must be weighed against the interests mentioned in Art. 45 UPCA. 2. A party can at any stage – also after the end of the proceedings – request for confidentiality of certain information submitted under R.262.2 RoP. 3. The general line of argument as well as the nature of evidence provided by the parties of the main proceedings as well as the working of the Court can be examined by the applicant based on the redacted versions. |
Application R. 262.1 (b) RoP; Confidentiality request R. 262.2 RoP; Art. 45 UPCA. |
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings v. Guangdong OPPO, OROPE |
UPC_CFI_ 210/2023 |
App_52033/2024 |
ORD_52137/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1.Beweisanträge, die nach Abschluss des Zwischenverfahrens gestellt sind, sind regelmäßig zurückzuweisen. 2. Ein Parteigutachter, der zu methodischen Fragen eines ökonomischen Gutachtens befragt werden soll, ist kein Zeuge. Es kommt allenfalls eine Anhörung nach Regel 181 VerfO in Betracht. 3. Ob unter Umständen weitere Beweise erforderlich sind, kann der Spruchkörper gemäß Regel 114 VerfO entscheiden. |
Parteisachverständiger, Zeuge, Antrag nach Abschluss des Zwischenverfahrens |
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Meril v. Edwards |
UPC_CFI_189/2024 |
App_45333/2024 |
ORD_45922/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
17/09/2024 |
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. v. Dexcom Inc., Dexcom International Limited |
UPC_CFI_424/2023 |
App_44664/2024 |
ORD_45345/2024 |
Amend Document |
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division |
English |
|
Leave to amend counter claim with a declaration of non-infringement granted after withdrawal of the infringement claim against one device (of two). R. 263.2 RoP requirements complied with. |
amendment of claim |
|
|
16/09/2024 |
ICPillar LLC v. Simulity Labs Limited, Arm Germany d.o.o, ARM Limited, Arm France SAS, SVF Holdco, Arm Poland Sp. z.o.o, Arm lreland Limited, Arm Germany GmbH, Arm Sweden AB, Apical Limited |
UPC_CoA_301/2024 |
APL_33746/2024 |
ORD_50692/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.2 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd., Xiaomi H.K. Limited, Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S, Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Shamrock Mobile GmbH, Odiporo GmbH, Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd., Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L |
UPC_CFI_ 219/2023 |
ACT_545615/2023 |
ORD_598442/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Zur Strukturierung einer SEP-Verhandlung |
SEP, FRAND, mündliche Verhandlung |
|
|
16/09/2024 |
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. ITCiCo Spain S.L. |
UPC_CFI_412/2023 |
App_5975/2024 |
ORD_51965/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Central Division - Seat |
English |
|
|
|
|
|
16/09/2024 |
Panasonic Holdings v. Guangdong OPPO, OROPE |
UPC_CFI_ 210/2023 |
ACT_545551/2023 |
ORD_598440/2023 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Mannheim (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
Zur Strukturierung einer SEP-Verhandlung |
SEP, FRAND, mündliche Verhandlung |
|
DE
EN
FR
NL