26/02/2025 |
Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG, Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG |
UPC_CFI_114/2024_UPC_CFI_448/2023 |
ORD_9486/2025 |
ORD_9486/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/02/2025 |
Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG, Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG |
UPC_CFI_114/2024_UPC_CFI_448/2024 |
App_2369/2025 |
ORD_2567/2025 |
Application Rop 362 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
26/02/2025 |
GISELA MAYER GmbH v. N.J DIFFUSION SARL |
UPC_CFI_363/2024 |
App_6598/2025 |
ORD_6886/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
French |
|
|
|
|
26/02/2025 |
Grundfos Holding A/S v. Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump Co., Ltd. |
UPC_CFI_11/2024 |
App_8530/2025 |
ORD_8568/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
25/02/2025 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock, Guangdong OPPO, OROPE |
UPC_CFI_220/2024_UPC_CFI_221/2024 |
App_619/2025 |
ORD_3605/2025 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
25/02/2025 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi, Odiporo, Shamrock, Guangdong OPPO, OROPE |
UPC_CFI_220/2024_UPC_CFI_221/2024 |
App_608/2025 |
ORD_3604/2025 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
25/02/2025 |
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Guangdong OPPO, OROPE |
UPC_CFI_208/2023 |
App_516/2025 |
ORD_3236/2025 |
Application Rop 333 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
24/02/2025 |
Biolitec Holding GmbH & Co. KG v. Light Guide Optics Germany GmbH, S.I.A. LIGHTGUIDE International |
UPC_CoA_540/2024 |
APL_52692/2024 |
ORD_68945/2024 |
Appeal RoP220.1 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
24/02/2025 |
Bruker Spatial Biology, Inc., Luxendo GmbH, Bruker Nederland B.V. v. 10x Genomics, Inc., Nanostring Technologies Inc., |
UPC_CFI_2/2023 |
App_15954/2024 |
ORD_16106/2024 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
24/02/2025 |
Hand Held Products, Inc. v Scandit Ag |
UPC_CFI_73/2024 UPC_CFI_408/2024 |
App_7141/2025 |
ORD_9117/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
21/02/2025 |
Hanshow France Sas, Hanshow Netherlands B.V., Hanshow Technology Co. Ltd, Hanshow Germany Gmbh v. VusionGroup SA |
UPC_CoA_618/2024 |
ORD_8874/2025 |
ORD_8874/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
German |
|
|
|
|
20/02/2025 |
Bhagat Textile Engineers v. Oerlikon textiles GmbH & Co KG, Himson Engineering Private Limited |
UPC_CFI_240/2023 |
App_3348/2025 |
ORD_4166/2025 |
Application RoP262.1 (b) |
Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division |
Italian |
|
|
|
|
20/02/2025 |
Cretes NV v. Hyler BV |
UPC_CFI_216/2024_UPC_CFI_556/2024 |
App_6987/2025 |
ORD_7825/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division |
Dutch |
|
|
|
|
20/02/2025 |
10x Genomics, Inc. v. Curio Bioscience Inc. |
UPC_CFI_463/2023 |
App_2588/2025 |
ORD_3005/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
Release of a deposite, R. 352 RoP |
|
19/02/2025 |
Nokia Technologies Oy ao v. Shanghai Sunmi Technology Co., Ltd ao |
UPC_CFI_112/2025 |
ACT_7300/2025 |
- |
Application for provisional measures |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
|
|
19/02/2025 |
Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. v. SWARCO FUTURIT, Yunex GmbH |
UPC_CFI_156/2024 |
ORD_8499/2025 |
ORD_8499/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
Rule 262.1.b RoP |
|
19/02/2025 |
Lionra Technologies Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Systems Gmbh |
UPC_CFI_58/2024 |
ACT_7940/2024 |
ORD_65550/2024 |
Infringement Action |
Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1. Zur Auslegung eines Patents dessen Aufgabe es ist, die zeitliche Verzögerung, die sog. Latenzzeit, bei der Bearbeitung von Datenpaketen und insbesondere Headern bei der Übertragung in einem drahtlosen Netzwerk zu überwinden. 2. Bei der Auslegung des Patentanspruchs sind neben dem Wortlaut die Anwendungsbeschreibung und ausdrückliche Offenbarungen in der Beschreibung der Patentschrift heranzuziehen. |
Art. 69 EPÜ, Art. 25 EPGÜ |
|
19/02/2025 |
Swarco Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.M.B.H. v. Yunex Gmbh, Stadt Mönchengladbach |
UPC_CFI_156/2024 |
ACT_16855/2024 |
ORD_24915/2024 |
Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
1. Regel 360 VerfO ist auf Anträge auf Beweissicherung entsprechend anzuwenden. Insoweit liegt - wie auch für Verfahren auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung (vgl. LK München ORD_577734/2023 UPC_CFI_249/2023) - eine Regelungslücke vor._x000D_
2. Regel 198.1 VerfO ist auf Fälle der Erledigung eines Antrags auf Beweissicherung unter den Umständen des vorliegenden Falls entsprechend anzuwenden. Insoweit besteht eine planwidrige Regelungslücke._x000D_
3. Die Kostenentscheidung bleibt in derartigen Fällen dem Hauptverfahren vorbehalten. |
Kostenentscheidung im Hauptverfahren, Antrag auf Beweissicherung, Erledigung, Anordnung der Erhebung der Hauptsache |
|
19/02/2025 |
Maxeon Solar Pte. Ltd.,v. Aiko Energy Germany GmbH, Solarlab Aiko Europe GmbH, Powerdeal Srl, Libra Energy, VDH Solar Groothandel, Coenergia Srl |
UPC_CFI_336/2024_UPC_CFI_605/2024 |
App_7738/2025 |
ORD_7932/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division |
English |
|
|
Extension of time limits |
|
19/02/2025 |
Mammoet Holding B.V. v. P.T.S Machinery B.V. |
UPC_CFI_16/2025 |
ACT_1474/2025 |
ORD_7979/2025 |
Application for preserving evidence pursuant to RoP192 |
Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
19/02/2025 |
Dyson Technology Limited v. SharkNinja Germany GmbH, SharkNinja Europe Limited |
UPC_CFI_322/2024_UPC_CFI_588/2024 |
App_5119/2025 |
ORD_8529/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
R 265 RoP |
|
19/02/2025 |
SharkNinja Germany GmbH, SharkNinja Europe Limited v. Dyson Technology |
UPC_CFI_322/2024_UPC_CFI_588/2024 |
App_5727/2025 |
ORD_8527/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division |
German |
|
|
R 265 RoP |
|
19/02/2025 |
Posco v. v. ArcelorMittal, Autohaus Adelbert Moll Gmbh & Co. Kg, Xpeng Motors (Netherlands) Bv , Asian Motors Sales Bv, Moll Gmbh & Co.Kg, Xpeng European Holding Bv , Jean Lain Automobiles Sas, Hedin Automotive Sa, Xpeng Motors (Belgium) Sarl , E-Lain Sas, Ejner Hessel A/S, Bilia Ab, Xpeng Motors France Sarl |
UPC_CFI_583/2024 |
ORD_8329/2025 |
ORD_8329/2025 |
Generic Order |
Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division |
English |
|
|
|
|
19/02/2025 |
Aarke AB v. SodaStream Industries Ltd. |
UPC_CoA_844/2024 |
App_1387/2025 |
ORD_7231/2025 |
Application Rop 265 |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
Where an application to withdraw an action pursuant to R. 265 RoP has been made and the other party, despite having been given the opportunity to do so, has not requested to have any costs reimbursed, the Court concludes that there is no need for a cost decision. |
cost decision, withdrawal of an action |
|
19/02/2025 |
Network System Technologies LLC v. Volkswagen AG |
UPC_CoA_218/2024_UPC_CoA_220/2024_UPC_CoA_222/2024 |
App_2709/2025 |
ORD_8348/2025 |
Generic application |
Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) |
English |
|
When a party applies for the release of a deposit, which was made as a security for costs, because the underlying infringement action has been withdrawn, R. 352.2 RoP, which provides that the Court may upon the application of a party release a security for enforcement, should be applied by way of analogy. |
release of a security for costs |
|