Moteur de recherche
dans les décisions
de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet

Bienvenue dans ce moteur de recherche dans les décisions de la Juridiction unifiée du brevet (JUB)

À propos et fonctionnement

Cette base de données privée, maintenue par Pierre Véron, met gracieusement à votre disposition les décisions rendues publiques par la Juridiction unifiée du brevet depuis son entrée en activité le 1er juin 2023 et un moteur de recherche pour les explorer.

Elle contient aussi des traductions automatiques en anglais (de courtoisie et sans garantie)  des décisions qui n’ont pas été rendues en anglais (ainsi que quelques traductions automatiques en français).

Pour voir TOUTES les décisions disponibles, tapez une astérisque * dans la case Recherche globale.

Recherche par mots (“preuve”,“evidence” ou “beweis”) ou par expressions (“procédure accélérée”, “accelerated proceedings” ou “beschleunigtes verfahren”).

Utilisation possible des opérateurs booléens (en anglais et en majuscules) :

  • test AND anticorps” , “test AND antibodies” ou “test AND antikörper
  • avocat OR représentant”,  “lawyer OR representative” ou “anwalt OR vertreter
  • test AND NOT anticorps”, “test AND NOT antibodies” ou “test AND NOT antikörper

Joker pour un caractère: ? Joker pour plusieurs caractères: *

Pour plus d’informations sur la syntaxe de recherche cliquez ici


175 résultats trouvés




Date
Parties
Numéro de l'affaire
Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance
Type d'action
Juridiction - Division
Langue de procédure
Sommaire
Mots clés
Documents
Date Parties Numéro de l'affaire Numéro de la décision ou de l'ordonnance Type d'action Juridiction - Division Langue de procédure Details Sommaire Mots clés Documents
22/09/2023 N.V. Nutricia v. Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH UPC_CFI_201/2023 ORD_575922/2023 Application for the allocation of a technically qualified judge to the panel Court of First Instance - Düsseldorf (DE) Local Division English 1. Pursuant to R. 33.1 and .2 RoP, any party to the proceedings may lodge an Application for allocating a technically qualified judge (TQJ) to the panel, which request shall be lodged as early as possible in the written procedure. 2. The allocation of t Technically qualiefied judge (TQJ), defendant, request, allocation, President, Court of First Instance, submission, postponement, judge-rapporteur, statement of defence
21/09/2023 Jozef Frans Nelissen v OrthoApnea S.L. UPC_CFI_329/2023 ORD_575902/2023 Application for preserving evidence Court of First Instance - Brussels (BE) Local Division Dutch rder pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence (allegedly infringing products and related documents). Extremely urgent. Order granted without hearing the allegedly infringing party. Possibility for revision and appeal.  Order pursuant to R. 192 e.s. RoP to preserve evidence
21/09/2023 ASTELLAS INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE v HEALIOS K.K, RIKEN, OSAKA UNIVERSITY UPC_CFI_75/2023 ORD_552745/2023 Application RoP262.1(b) Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section English Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service.
20/09/2023 Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH UPC_CFI_1/2023 ORD_550152/2023 Application RoP262.1(b) Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section English Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. To be informed of the proceedings before the Unified Patent Court for the purposes of edu Rule 262.1(b) RoP request (rejected). Legitimate reason for access (no). No legal basis for access to letter for service.
19/09/2023 NanoString Technologies Inc., NanoStrings Technologies Germany GmbH, NanoString Technologies Netherlands B.V. v. 10x Genomics, Inc., President and Fellows of Harvard College UPC_CFI_2/2023 ACT_459746/2023 Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German Leitsätze: 1. Für eine ausreichend sichere Überzeugung des Gerichts von der Gültigkeit eines Patentes ist im Rahmen einer Anordnung einstweiliger Maßnahmen nach Art. 62 EPGÜ eine überwiegende Wahrscheinlichkeit notwendig, aber auch ausrei- chend  
13/09/2023 CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v. ALPINA COFFEE SYSTEMS GmbH UPC_CFI_182/2023 ACT_528738/2023 Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Vienna (AT) Local Division German Ein Antrag auf einstweilige Maßnahmen macht – wie eine Klage – die Inanspruchnahme der Ausnahmeregel nach R 5 der VerfO („Opt-out“) unwirksam. Der Blockademechanismus bewirkt, dass die Zuständigkeit des EPG nicht mehr entzogen werden kann. Der Schutzbereich eines europäischen Patents ist anhand von Art 69 Abs 1 EPÜ samt seinem Auslegungsprotokoll in Verbindung mit Art 24 Abs 1 lit c EPGÜ auszulegen. In einem Verfahren auf einstweilige Maßnahmen können der obsiegenden Antragsgegnerin auf Antrag endgültig Verfahrenskosten zugesprochen werden. Die Antragstellerin kann selbst bei Prozesserfolg im Verfahren in der Hauptsache die Kosten dieses Verfahrens als unterliegende Partei nicht erfolgreich geltend machen.  
11/09/2023 OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS UPC_CFI_57/2023 557045/2023 Infrigement action Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division Italian    
08/09/2023 OCADO INNOVATION LIMITED v. AUTOSTORE AS UPC_CFI_11/2023 ORD_459791/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Nordic Baltic Regional Division English Keynotes:  
29/08/2023 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v Amgen, Inc. UPC_ CFI_14/2023 ORD_566193/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
28/08/2023 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. UPC_CFI_249/2023 ORD_567601/2023 Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
28/08/2023 AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL UPC_CFI_214/2023 ORD_567563/2023 Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division English    
28/08/2023 AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL UPC_CFI_214/2023 ORD_567559/2023 Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division English    
28/08/2023 AIM Sport Vision AG v Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL UPC_CFI_214/2023 ORD_567421/2023 Infringement Action, Application for provisional measures Court of First Instance - Helsinki (FI) Local Division English    
25/08/2023 Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE v. Tesla Germany u.a. UPC_CFI_52/2023 ORD_567008/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
24/08/2023 Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH UPC_CFI_1/2023 ORD_560432/2023 Preliminary Objection Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section English Infringement action has been lodged at a local or regional division and, if so, at what date and time this was done. Central division competent because revocation action was filed before the infringement action. Preliminary objection, Rule 19.1(b) RoP, Article 33.4 UCPA, internal competence, competence central division (yes), date and time of lodging, Article 4.2 RoP, hard-copy lodging, Registry Rules.
23/08/2023 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. UPC_CFI 15/2023 ORD_562614/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
22/08/2023 Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited UPC_CFI_54/2023 ORD_560542/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Hamburg (DE) Local Division German    
17/08/2023 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v Amgen, Inc. UPC_ CFI_14/2023 ORD 562104/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
16/08/2023 Amgen Inc. ./.Sanof-Aventis Deutschland GmbH UPC_CFI_14/2023 ORD_562104/2023 General procedural order Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
14/08/2023 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. UPC_CFI_249/2023 App_560315/2023 Procedural Order Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
10/08/2023 Meril GmbH v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation u. a. UPC _CFI_15/2023 ORD_557466/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
03/08/2023 Plant-e Knowledge B.V., Plant-e B.V. v. Arkyne Technologies S.L. UPC_CFI_239/2023 ORD_555528/2023 Generic procedural Application Court of First Instance - The Hague (NL) Local Division Dutch Infringement proceeding - procedural order - no translation of exhibits required (R. 7.1 RoP) Procedural order, translation of exhibits not required
01/08/2023 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. UPC_CFI_15/2023 App_557291/2023 Infringement Action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German Extension of time limit for preliminary objection preliminary objection, time limit, extension
28/07/2023 Amgen Inc. ./.Sanof-Aventis Deutschland GmbH UPC_CFI_14/2023 ORD_556750/2023 Infrigement action Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Local Division German    
21/07/2023 Himson Engineering Private Limited UPC_CFI_240-2023 ORD_552789/2023 Infrigement action Court of First Instance - Milan (IT) Local Division Italian    
1 ... 5 6 7